Readify

Samwell Tarly–Dareon

A Feast for Crows

Samwell Tarly–Dareon is defined by a painful imbalance: Samwell Tarly treats Dareon as a sworn brother whose talents and obligations still belong to the Night’s Watch, while Dareon increasingly imagines the order as a sentence he has escaped. Their rupture is therefore more than a quarrel between companions. It exposes the fragile social bond created by the black cloak, showing how a common punishment can produce solidarity in one man and resentment, opportunism, and flight in another.

Brotherhood and Contrasting Futures

Samwell Tarly and Dareon travel together after Jon Snow appoints Dareon as a recruiter. The singer is to replace Yoren, who has vanished and is presumed dead, traveling through the Seven Kingdoms, singing of the valor of the Night’s Watch, and returning periodically with new recruits. This new assignment appears to offer Dareon a life beyond the Wall: he can use the voice and charm he has always valued at noble courts, while still serving the order in name. Sam sees that possibility as a genuine happy ending for his companion, even while he doubts his own future as he travels toward the Citadel to forge a maester’s chain.

The contrast is sharpened by Sam’s inward division. He tells himself that he is going to the Citadel to serve the Night’s Watch better, yet he does not want the chain, does not want to leave his brothers, and does not want to face the father who sent him to the Wall to die. Dareon’s prospects seem less burdened. Sam imagines him singing across the Seven Kingdoms and returning with recruits, whereas Sam’s own voyage feels colder and deeper the longer he looks toward the sea. Their shared journey thus contains two different meanings of service: Sam clings to obligation as a reason to endure fear, while Dareon sees movement away from the Wall as the reward he was owed.

The Fraying of Trust in Braavos

In Braavos, the relationship deteriorates through absence before it breaks openly. Sam stands at a window watching evening mist rise along the old canal and worries that Dareon has again become drunk or has found another girl. He cannot decide whether to curse or weep. Dareon was supposed to be his brother, and Sam believes that no one could sing better when asked, even though he doubts Dareon’s willingness to do anything else. The complaint is practical as well as emotional: Dareon has promised to return with wine and food, and Sam is left waiting with Gilly and her infant.

Gilly’s observation makes the alienation explicit. She says that Dareon does not like being with them, that the place is sad, and that he prefers wine and smiles. Her words distinguish the small, vulnerable household Sam is trying to protect from the pleasure-seeking world Dareon has chosen. Dareon’s disappearance is not merely a lapse in punctuality. It becomes evidence that he is withdrawing from the fellowship of the Night’s Watch and from the dependent people whose safety gives Sam’s journey its purpose.

When Sam finally finds Dareon at the Happy Port, the setting confirms the change. A one-eyed woman embraces Sam; dancers circle a red priest; sailors, gamblers, and sex workers crowd the establishment; and Dareon sits at the center, nuzzling a woman wearing his black cloak. He introduces her drunkenly as his wife and treats the black garment, once a sign of sworn brotherhood, as something that can be lent to a naked bride. Dareon still calls Sam his sworn brother, but the gesture turns the title into mockery: the cloak remains visible while the duty it represents has become ornamental.

Duty, Desertion, and the Failed Appeal

Dareon’s contempt becomes unmistakable when he urges Sam to drink, take a prostitute, or do both, and crudely speculates about Sam’s relationship with Gilly. Sam refuses the invitation and reminds him of the promise to bring back wine and food. Dareon answers by mocking the idea that Sam could have killed an Other through scolding and tells him that if he will not drink to the marriage, he should leave. The exchange places two moral vocabularies against each other. Sam speaks in terms of promises, shared care, and immediate responsibility; Dareon answers through laughter, sexual bravado, money, and the claim that the black brotherhood no longer governs him.

Sam nevertheless makes one final appeal to their common purpose. He asks Dareon to return with him because Maester Aemon has awakened and wants to hear about the dragons, bleeding stars, white shadows, and dreams that may offer him comfort. Sam does not ask only for personal loyalty. He frames the request as service to an old brother and as a task that might ease Aemon’s suffering. Dareon refuses, saying that he is finished with Sam and with black. He removes his cloak from the woman and throws it into Sam’s face, telling him to put the rag over the old man because Dareon will not need it; he expects velvet, furs, and a richer life.

The cloak’s transformation gives the scene its central symbolic reversal. For Sam, it is still the material sign of a vow and a connection to brothers who must care for one another. For Dareon, it is discarded clothing, useful only as a covering for someone else. Sam’s appeal fails because the two men no longer inhabit the same institution emotionally, even though they still share its language and history.

The Physical Rupture

Sam hits Dareon without thinking. His anger over the broken promise, the abandonment of Aemon, and the desecration of their brotherhood overwhelms the fear that usually restrains him. He knocks Dareon over a low table, punches him in the face and belly, batters his shoulders, head-butts him when Dareon seizes his wrists, and smashes him in the nose. The fight is not a measured act of justice; it is an eruption from a man who has been repeatedly left to carry duty, fear, and care alone.

The violence also reveals how far Sam’s relationship with Dareon has moved from dependence to repudiation. Sam has treated the singer as a brother whose return mattered, waiting for him, defending the meaning of their shared obligations, and trying to bring him back to Aemon. In the brothel, that hope changes into bodily punishment. Other people drag Sam away, but he strikes one of them as well before something hard crashes into his head. He wakes only as he is thrown headfirst through the fog into the canal, where the water smashes into his face.

The Meaning of the Break

Their separation parallels the broader distinction between a sworn brother and a broken man. Septon Meribald explains that broken men are commonly born among ordinary people who were taken from their homes for war, exposed to battle, hunger, wounds, theft, rape, and the death of family and friends until their identities and loyalties disintegrate. They become dangerous, yet remain deserving of pity. Dareon is not presented in Meribald’s speech as a direct example of that battlefield history, but the framework illuminates the relationship’s moral tension: institutions demand loyalty from people whose experiences may leave them alienated from the banners they once followed.

Sam’s response differs from Dareon’s because he continues to make other people the measure of his choices. He is frightened by the sea, by the Citadel, and by his father, but tells himself he is going for Gilly, Maester Aemon, and the Night’s Watch. Dareon instead pursues wine, smiles, sexual freedom, and the imagined prosperity of velvet and furs. The breach therefore does not resolve into a simple opposition between courage and cowardice. It is a conflict between competing responses to confinement: Sam converts suffering into obligation, while Dareon tries to turn escape into a new identity.

The final image is not reconciliation but submersion. Sam’s attempt to recover his brother ends with the black cloak rejected, the promise abandoned, a fight in a public house, and Sam cast into dark water. Their relation becomes a decisive instance of Night’s Watch neutrality and brotherhood failing at the personal level: the vow may still exist institutionally, but Dareon has withdrawn from it, and Sam’s inability to accept that withdrawal converts grief into violence. The relationship’s significance lies in that unresolved contradiction, where loyalty remains morally compelling even after the person to whom it was owed has chosen to leave it behind.